AI you can vouch for.
Huscribe for what AI does. Mairit for what AI produces.
Huscribe checks AI agents against what your team approved and leaves the evidence to release.Mairit puts a qualified reviewer behind the work AI produces and records their decision.
AI is everywhere at work. Reliance is rare.
AI can do the work. It cannot vouch for it. As AI moves into work with consequences, it stalls in two places: the system nobody will sign off on releasing, and the work nobody will put their name to.
Does the system do what we approved?
Can a qualified person stand behind what it produced?
Huscribe answers the first. Mairit answers the second. Human plus AI. The whole name, the whole bet.
One protects the decision to release. The other protects the decision to rely.
One problem. Two places it shows up.
Sometimes you need both.
When an AI agent produces work with consequences, Huscribe checks that the system did what you approved, and Mairit reviews what it produced. Both can run on the same workflow.
Which one do you need?
The risk is in what the AI does. You need to decide whether an agent can be released, whether it still does what you approved, or what should change after a failure.
Start with Huscribe →The risk is in what the AI produced. You need a qualified person to review, approve, certify, or stand behind the finished work.
Start with Mairit →Both carry consequences. Huscribe checks the system. Mairit reviews the work.
Talk to us →One accountability model.
Define the standard. Check the evidence. Name who decides. Keep the record.
Huscribe applies it to what AI does. Mairit applies it to what AI produces. The mechanisms differ. The rule does not: AI takes the volume, a person owns the decision that carries weight.
How it works →Built to be inspected, not taken on faith.
Audited to SOC 2 Type II and certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, both products in scope. Encrypted in transit and at rest. Review, release, and admin actions are logged. The SOC 2 report is available under NDA, the ISO certificate on request.
